About BBHM

The first
question is why do we need anything other than the customary practice we’ve
built up over the years? And the answer would be that many of those practices
are remnants of a past that was radically different from today.

The Houses
of Parliament from
Those conditions of use and the utility value of horses
joined together to produce an attitude that was completely different to that of
today: the following quote is from a recent book by Ann Norton Greene: By
century’s end, the people driving the horses were in most cases mere employees,
who thought of horses as company property. As managers demanded the hauling of
larger and larger loads, the employees sometimes abused the horses to satisfy
them. (1) Pretty much the whole focus of horse management during the age was how
the greatest use could be made of the horse – and, once the horse is confined in
a building behaviour becomes of less importance, except where it either
interferes with or restricts use.

Go back
further in history and we come to a time in which many horses were kept
extensively by nomadic or semi nomadic peoples. Their survival required that
they knew the horse in a very different way. Without fences and walls and gates
your ability to manage and maintain a herd of horses for the use of your
immediate or extended family depended entirely on how well you understand their
behavior. Each day your primary task was to make certain the herd had sufficient
feed and water, or you could expect them to voluntarily relocate! With the
horses constantly moving they tended to stay far fitter and healthier, and there
was far less need to protect the tough durable hoof that such movement produces.
But competing stallions, geldings and mares need to be effectively managed, and
in such a way that organized cavalry maneuvers can be mounted rapidly. Very
little of the knowledge from this older past has trickled down, often because it
was held by people with no written language – which is a great shame. There may
be a lot more useful lessons to be learnt from those more distant times than
from much closer history.

Arguably
what we need is an up to date and complete philosophy suited to these present
needs, rather than a mish-mash of customary practices from the past that reflect
a different reality. Behavior based horse management (BBHM) is one attempt to
create one.
You’ll note that the word
‘natural’ is completely absent so far – and for good reason, since the meaning
is so very open to perception. For example ‘natural behaviors’ would likely
refer to those found in an ethogram of a particular feral or semi-feral group –
in a single, specific, environment.
But whilst free
expression of those behaviors has often been seen as synonymous with ‘good
welfare’, the behaviors a native pony may need to carry out in the New Forest,
or a brumby in the Australian outback, are not necessarily going to be the same
as those of a fully domestic horse living in the suburbs of an industrial city.
In each case what the horse needs is to carry out a package of behaviors that
allow it to become functionally adapted to its specific environment. How natural
or not those behaviors are, or by what standard they’re ‘naturalness’ might be
judged is really irrelevant.
In any
case for most horses it’s the human element within their environment that has by
far the most powerful impact. And if the horse is going to survive in a domestic
environment its ability to interact with people successfully is essential. There
are behaviors that might work for feral horses but that don’t fit the majority
of domestic environments. Encouraging the expression of a behavior from the
‘wild’, but that has a negative effect on the ability of the horse to function
well in a domestic environment makes no good sense, no matter how ‘natural’ it
might be.
BBHM operates on a
principle, shared with conservationists and the organic movement (2), that what
is needed is a caretaker, whose role is defined as “a human who assists animals
in their daily interplay with their environment”. (3)
So the
caretaker’s role is to assist the horse to adapt functionally, and fortunately
horses are very adaptable creatures. Even so, there are going to be environments
to which it is simply not possible for the horse to adapt, and in which it fails
to function well. What makes sense in that situation is to acknowledge the
reality, and move the horse out and into one where successful adaptation is
possible. Across the remaining range of environments how much work the caretaker
has to do will depend; in some the horses are going to need a lot of assistance
to get through each day, in others far less.
So what
would ‘successful adaptation’ mean?
Let’s consider a horse kept primarily for riding. The horse will need to be
healthy, and both physically strong and fit enough to carry the rider’s weight
in comfort and safety. The horse’s senses need to be operating efficiently so
that the horse is able to make decisions while being ridden that impact on rider
safety. The horse needs to be well rested and in a well balanced emotional and
psychological state in order to interact well with both the rider and the riding
environment. Effective communication must exist between horse and rider, plus a
co-operative attitude in which the horse carries out the movements that are
communicated to it willingly – and for that to happen the attitude of the horse
to that particular person, and really to people in general, has to be good. And
obviously the adaptation should have some duration – so however the horse is
kept it has to be sustainable over an extended period.

If they are
to assist the horse to adapt functionally caretakers have to be able to design
and manage environments that reliably produce the desired outcome. And for it to
have widespread value it has to be done at a reasonable cost.
A majority
of the horses that are slaughtered each year have failed to adapt in some way.
Physical problems such as with feet from insufficient movement, or lower leg
lameness’s from being put into work too early, allergic reactions to housing,
obesity and other systemic issues from feed problems, plus the raft of
psychological problems; dangerous or anti-social behavior, stereotypies, work
intolerance, anxiety and depression.
The aim of a philosophy like BBHM is to facilitate successful adaptation to the
benefit of all involved – horse, people and the greater environment.
1. Norton
Greene, A. (2008)
HORSES AT WORK -
Harnessing Power in
Industrial
2. Algers,
B. (1990) “Naturligt beteende – ett naturligt begrepp?.” Svensk Veterinartidning.
3. Segerdahl,
P. (2006) Can natural behavior be cultivated? The farm as local human/animal
culture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2007) 20:167-193
The BBHM and associated Herdworks sites are being updated constantly - so now and then there'll be links that aren't working, but we're adding pages as fast as possible - so please keep visiting!
If you'd like to continue with the complete tour through BBHM simply login (or register if you're a new visitor)click on the "Next Page" link at the bottom of each page - the tour will take you on a logical transition through the different areas of horse management. Or, if you would rather go directly to the topics that interest you most then just follow the "Website Navigation" link on the bar you'll find at the bottom of each page and choose your entry point.
| Members Area Login | Website Navigation | Herdworks | Equine Behavior | Contact |